|
City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra · conducted by Walter Weller
CHANDOS CHAN 9084-86 This review is generously sponsored by HMV Singapore. by Derek Lim
Having sung lately in the Beethoven Choral Fantasy, I must admit that
it has settled my idea of the Beethoven concertos as a whole. I remember
when I first listened to the Violin Concerto that I thought to myself, "This
must be one of the most boring things I have ever heard" -- now I find it
pure gold. The piano concertos were not easy fare either; I was more used
to the flashy virtuosity of Tchaikovsky and other composers.
Beethoven's first movement structure is I find very much "just" a set of
variations, for example. But Beethoven's gift for sound and tone makes
these mere variations sparkle with invention. He is like Brahms, a genius in
the variation. Brahms' Fourth Symphony's last movement is virtually a study in
this, yet, like Beethoven before him, the variation is only incidental to
the overall "programme", or direction of the piece. The movement in the end
never fails to reflect the adventurous spirit of Beethoven.
Do John Lill and Walter Weller live up to this spirit? In spirit of
performance, they are on the whole not really adventurous. In the first
movements, for example, though they are in themselves very different.
Perhaps I could generalize a little: Walter Weller's shaping of the works is
not as accurate as that of Lill's -- he manages to make the orchestral tuttis
sound rather un-spirited sometimes. The City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra (CBSO)
is not in top form unfortunately, away from their usual conductor (Sir Simon
Rattle, who is by the way leaving the CBSO), they don't seem to play just as
well. Sharpness is lacking, for example, and ensemble though finer than
most, could be bettered.
Lill has a nice tone and his virtuosity cannot be
doubted, though there is a part in the "Emperor" which I though could have
warranted a retake -- Lill's playing sounds a little clumsy. Overall Lill
tends to have a more heroic conception of the last three concertos,
especially in the first and last movements. Beyond that, I rarely had
the feel that the conductor and the soloist were one in conception of the
work.
I find that the most satisfactory is in fact the Third. This is
played well indeed, and is one of the rare chances where the soloist and
conductor really seemed to cooperate. The "Emperor", though not without its
faults, is on the whole very well taken -- Lill's own brand of athleticism
shows up here, to great effect. He could afford to be more Romantic, though.
The First and Second Concertos, often overlooked in concert halls due to
their less memorable tunes and their lesser degree of maturity, are
performed in a more understated manner, though again I find that the
conductor gets somewhat in the way. These concertos are less demanding
where ensemble is concerned, and fare rather better where the pianist is
also the conductor. Not the most special playing here.
John
Lill doesn't lack experience in these works, on the contrary this is
probably the third time he's recording these. However, for a Tchaikovsky
First Prize winner I find his playing a little lacking in spontaneity. He
does a fine job with the middle movements, though again, for me, the tone of
the piano gets in the way of things.
When Beethoven composed, in between the "serious" works -- the symphonies,
the sonatas, the concertos, he would also compose Bagatelles, or literally,
"jokes". These are little short solo piano works that include, for example,
the famous Für Elise, to an unknown lady whom Beethoven had admired.
While
the complete Piano Concertos and Bagatelles have been recorded many times over, this is probably the first time that they are
being presented together in a set. The Bagatelles show a different side of
Beethoven's psyche, and it is good to have them played so well here. Again,
I wish for a little more daring, but I am grateful that Lill does not try
to overplay these works. He's more an "un-interventionist" [Oh dear! The Editor disclaims all responsiblity for this word - Ed.], I guess -- his
interpretation doesn't get in the way between the listener and the music.
All in all, I find that Lill has pretty good musicianship and his musicality
is undoubtable. A pity though, that the sound is what it is -- to my ears
not the most satisfactory. A worthy listen, though, for that Third
concerto, and also the Bagatelles. A rewarding set, in its own way, though
it in no way displaces the many sainted recommendations -- Fleisher/Szell (Sony Essential Classics, et
al for the last three concertos.
Derek Lim has no problem reaching for the B section either......
Other classical music reviews by this or any other writer can be obtained from the InkVault by doing a key word search with the writer's name.
228: 28.6.98. up.14.10.98 Readers' CommentsFrom: Simon Ashurst (sashurst@chandos-records.com / Tuesday, October 13, 1998 at 22:27:03) As a Chandos employee I must inform you of one blaring mistake. The Beethoven boxed set by John Lill is not in the Collect Series and therefore should not be mid price. [The mistake has been corrected. - Ed.] |