imagemap
Frédéric CHOPIN (1810-1849)

Piano Concerto No.1 in E minor, Op. 11
Piano Concerto No.2 in F minor, Op. 21

MARTHA ARGERICH piano
Orchestre Symphonique de Montreal conducted by Charles Dutoit


EMI Classics
56798-2

[69:04] full-price

by Jonathan Yungkans

Frederic ChopinThis is the second pairing of pianist Martha Argerich on EMI with Charles Dutoit and the Montreal Symphony. After their spectacular Prokofiev/Bartók CD (EMI 56654), I had seriously hoped that lightning would strike twice. Instead, any initial excitement over this project got washed out in the rain. Still, there is much to savor.

The lack of fire this time is not the fault of Martha Argerich. As in her Prokofiev and Bartók, she has supplanted some of her impetuousness for a slightly more legato approach that, to me, is musically more satisfying than in most of her previous outings. Much of the time, especially in her solo recordings, Argerich was too jumpy, too impulsive for me to enjoy. Exciting, yes, but not the kind of playing I would want to sit through more than once or twice.

In her most recent recordings, Argerich's playing, while losing none of its freshness or spontaneity, has been maturing like a fine wine. The edginess that sometimes marred her playing, in my opinion, has mellowed a little, while losing none of its boldness. In fact, when the piano makes its entrance in the first movement of the E minor concerto, Argerich is very bold indeed, almost explosively so. There is also plenty of power in the Rondo, but again, the athleticism is more of a good-humored one.

At the same time, she is digging deeper into the music than before, and if anything, she is more impish and sparkling at times than she was in her other recordings of these concertos (with Claudio Abbado in the E minor and Mstislav Rostapovich in the F minor). Her playing in the Romanza of the E minor glows with an inner warmth, and she is not above using a little rubato to give the piano line a coquettish gait, playfully teasing our aural palates.

Even in the F minor concerto, which Argerich has not played as often or been as comfortable with in the past, there is a greater tendency to bend the melodic line here and there, add a different twist or flavor. Yes, it seems like she wants to get on with the proceedings faster than she did in the E minor, but she is willing to pause here, phrase a little differently there, and make things as interesting as possible for herself and us. She's not just rushing here. She also slows down deliciously while playing the Larghetto, drawing out the cantabile quality, and we savor every note.

Argerich and DutoitIf Dutoit's conducting were as fine an elixir as Argerich's playing, we would have a truly fine vintage here. Unfortunately, we have water, not wine, from this part of the vineyard. Dutoit seems to be only going through the motions. His accompaniment is as gray and drab as a rain-filled sky, drenching any warmth, color, light or flavor out of the orchestra.

What's worse, the engineers have made this release sound as waterlogged at Dutoit's conducting. Instrumental details are so muffled, and the overall tone so sodden, that it sounds as if the engineers placed their microphones underwater. Only the piano is left high and dry, and perhaps that is part of the problem.

There is no balance between piano and orchestra, and very little of the teamwork or interplay between soloist and orchestra that made Prokofiev/Bartók such a delight. We get piano and precious little else. Part of this could be a lack of initiative on Dutoit's part, but much of it appears to be the engineers' doing. In focusing almost exclusively on the piano, they have turned a positive into a negative, giving us one bottle from which to sample instead of making available a complete tasting.

Is this the same team that gave these forces such clear, pristine sound on their previous release? If it isn't, EMI needs to get that team back to Montreal post haste. If it is the same team, they need to do some serious retesting of their microphone placements before making another recording with these forces.

A critic recently discussing the Krystan Zimmerman recording of these concertos (DG 459684 ) suggested it would have been better to have Argerich as soloist, with Zimmerman conducting the Polish Festival Orchestra, and the Deutsche Grammophon engineers who supervised the Zimmerman recording in the control booth. That would have been a dream recording - a classic vintage, as far as wines go.

But even though the vintage here is not a classic, Argerich's contribution still makes it a very fine one. Her rich, full-bodied performance transcends the flatness of the rest of this recording, lingering on the aural palate long after the last notes have faded. It is a memorable play of hints and flavors - one worth staying in the rain so as to take pleasure in every drop.

After writing this review, Jonathan Yungkans feels so sopping wet that he needs to get out in the California sun and dry out.

Click to Return to the Classical Index!...
or Visit the Inkvault archives!

765: 20.8.2000. up.15.9.2000 ©Jonathan Yungkans

Explore the Flying Inkpot

They're Alive!
Concert Reviews

Bit deadish:

Other Resources at The Flying Inkpot
Zine Scene Newslinks Movie Resources Booklinks
Chantelle L'amour Letters Page Inkvault Poetry
Home
MORE CHOPIN
  • The Études
    With Earl Wild (Chesky)

  • The Nocturnes
    With Maria João Pires (DG) and Vladimir Ashkenazy (Decca)

  • The Waltzes
    With Idil Biret (Naxos)

  • Richter: Chopin Recitals 1954-1977 On the Sviatoslav Richter Archives Volume 2 (Doremi Legendary Treasures)


  • Piano Concertos - Zimerman (DG)

  • Piano Concertos - Szekely (Naxos)

  • Piano Concertos - Kissin's 1984 recording (BMG)

  • Piano Concertos - Chamber Versions (BIS)
    Versions for Piano Quintet.


  • Harasiewicz - The Legendary Chopinist
    An Inktroduction by Evan Stephens
  • Readers' Comments


    From: Thong Kai (skynet8@singnet.com.sg / Friday, September 15, 2000 at 17:58:18)

    I do believe that of all the recordings of Chopin's piano concertos, the recordings by Fou Ts'ong certainly rank as some of the absolute best. My personal favourite is a 1980s recording by Fou Ts'ong with Muhai Tang conducting the Sinfonia Varsovia, on the Collins Classics label. BTW, Muhai Tang was recently in Singapore, conducting the SSO. His fiery conducting was quite a awesome sight (and sound) to behold, especially in Saint-Saen's "Organ" Symphony. Anyway, Fou Ts'ong's playing of the concertos in this recording was simply heavenly, ranging from exuding pure exhilaration to gentle romanticism. As mentioned in the review of Kissin's 1984 recording of the same concertos, the E minor concerto (especially the 1st movement) isn't exactly very technically demanding or difficult, but is so filled with a wide range of emotions that it's difficult for even an accomplished pianist to fully portray. To give an example, I've a recording of Ashkenazy playing Chopin's Polonaises. He was absolutely fiery with a brilliant technique, but the emotions fell flat, especially when compared to, let's say, Pollini's acclaimed rendition of the Polonaises on the Deutsche Grammophon label. Fou Ts'ong didn't fall into this trap in this recording. He had great smoothness in his legato passages, a hallmark of Chopin himself, and could easily flow so well from a light-hearted passage to another laden with heavy emotions. Technically, of course, he was awesome, with nary a flaw audible. Rubato, always surrounded by controversy in Chopin's works, was well-employed too. Generally, the left hand was kept tempo giusto while the right hand did the rubato. My favourite passage in the E minor concerto is the middle portion of the 1st movement, starting with the ascending chromatic semi-quavers. Here, the recording is simply breathtakingly powerful. It isn't just about thundering through the chords and octaves like Rubenstein did with the London Symphony/Barbirolli in a 1937 recording (at an insane speed too, the 1st movement was 15'43, as compared to Fou Ts'ong's 20'46). It's about creating a superbly graduated increase in tension and emotion in perfect harmony with the orchestra, as Fou Ts'ong successfully did here. Also, let's not forget the orchestral parts. Tang was simply brilliant. In both concertos, the openings were captivating, bursting forth with a violent turmoil of emotions before the piano enters. The balance between the orchestra and piano was just perfect as well, with the orchestra seamlessly complementing the pianist in the solo sections with bursts of notes. I think a few liberties were taken, with the orchestra being (most likely intentionally) allowed to overshadow the pianist in certain passages. However, these only served to enhance the wonderful co-ordination between pianist and orchestra, and this was a good effect. Quite clearly, I love this recording. Every moment in the CD sounded supremely wonderful to me. I highly recommend any recording of Chopin's piano concertos by Fou Ts'ong, though I doubt this particular recording is available anymore. Here's an interesting fact. The reason why the orchestra and piano parts blend so seamlessly in both of Chopin's piano concertos is that Chopin never wrote the orchestral parts for the individual instruments! He wrote out both concertos in their entirety on two staves for the piano, then simply marked the intended "orchestral" parts for the 2nd piano. It was F. Dobrzynski who actually orchestrated both concertos. Hence, one person could actually play the entire concertos by himself/herself!

    From: kodi (mhartupee@aol.com / Thursday, December 8, 2005 at 02:00:57)

    thanks for the pictures