imagemap


Sunday
2nd July, 2000

Victoria Concert Hall
7th International Piano Festival
Rising Stars of the New Millenium

Liszt Transcendental Etudes Nos. 8, 9, 10 & 11
Prokofiev Piano Sonata No.7 iin B-flat major Op.83
Chopin Four Ballades

Encores
Chopin Grand Polonaise
Liszt Consolation No.3

Freddy KEMPF piano

OVERALL NOISE RATING: 5 (Dismal- watches and alarms going off repeatedly, child making noise- this is the same kid that has haunted the audience for the past 4 days. Bronchial spasms from the crowd were rather exaggerated in between movements.)

The Noise Rating Index is a partially-objective measurement of pager and handphone blasts, 9pm and 10pm watch beeps, coughing-during-the-pianissimo-bits, intra-audience conversation and other mind-bogglingly inept noises emitted in the concert hall during actual performance of music. It is measured on a scale of 0 to 5, in increasing annoyance.

This review has been kindly sponsored by the Singapore Symphonia Co. Ltd


by Johann D'Souza

The much anticipated last day of the piano festival unfortunately turned out to be a sad affair, though I might also add that my fellow Inkpotter Derek disagreed. I believe that the British have finally found an exciting new pianist, something which has taken quite a while. The last one is John Ogdon, however I would not put Freddy Kempf in the same class - not yet at least. I am also more inclined now to believe why the judges were right to place Kempf at the third position at the recent Tchaikovsky competition, despite crowd support for the pianist. Read on...

The programme that he picked has got to be one of the most technically demanding . The Transcendental Etudes (selected records reviewed here), as suggested in the title, can transport you to a new plane; and Freddy Kempf did bring us there to some degree. A very tense and intense player, he began the Wilde Jagd at such a speed that the word "prestissimo" would be completely inadequate. Throwing caution to the wind was the order of the day and while you do get technical specialists who can go through the most difficult of pieces without a mistake, Kempf’s playing was often marred by wrong notes, wrong chords and blurred runs. Despite these intricacies, which can be forgiven, he made up with his intensity. He reminds me a lot of the young Pogorelich.

Freddy KempfKempf seemed to border on the extreme: some of his notes were overly emphasized and some of them cut off too quickly. However there were some sections which were clean, clear and well thought-out. This was especially so in the 11th Etude (Harmonies du soir). Etude No. 10 was rather disappointing - his speed blistered through some of the more important facets of the piece and much of it was lost through a lack of thorough understanding.

The Prokofiev Sonata captured more interest. I was especially curious about it and waited in anticipation to hear the third movement - the Precipitato. The last time I heard this piece was when Boris Berman played it in the Piano Festival some years ago to make up for the indisposed Andrei Gavrilov. Berman, a well-known pedagogue and Prokofiev specialist, played with true grit, enthusiasm and an ironclad hold on the piece. Kempf’s reading however was slightly too fast, once again lacking depth, although most of the technical aspects of the piece was relatively covered well. If one was looking for a mighty revelation it did not come, unfortunately.

The much anticipated Preciptato was taken at such a breakneck speed (I have not seen anything like this before) that Kempf got lost in some areas. Runs were often muffled by the pedal and although the crowd greeted the ending with cheers, those of us who knew the piece cringed in silence.

7th International
Piano Festival 2000

June 29 - Jon Nakamatsu
June 30 - Konstantin Lifschitz
July 1 - Nikolai Lugansky
July 2 - Freddy Kempf

The second half of the programme provided us with a Lisztian display of the Chopin Ballades, I was very disappointed from the onset of the first Ballade in G minor. Kempf’s lack of textual fidelity was my major point of contention. Secondly his sudden shifts of tempo were the order of the day and this is where the salient points of the piece were missing.

Some of his runs were rather muffled from his over zealous use of the pedal and over-syncopated notes which stood out like a sore thumb. His F major Ballade which should start off at Adagio sounded more like Allegretto and in the repeat passages sounded even faster. The build up to the flourish did not materialize because I felt he shot off too quickly and too soon that all expected anticipation was lost .

The Third Ballade I felt was a bit of an exaggeration. I could not connect at all to his interpretation in any way. Some of the more clearly defined sections of the Ballade were totally lost through skimpy dynamics and muffled runs. As for the Fourth Ballade, he started off typically like the first three - too fast. Some of his notes were banged out like a Lisztian Rhapsody. I felt rather disappointed as this is perhaps one of the worst renditions of the Ballades I have ever heard.

For his encores, he played Chopin’s Waltz Polonaise. For those who love the composer, especially as a Romantic one, you have to agree with me that he slaughtered this encore and the much-loved Liszt Consolation, which was also marred by some harsh dynamics that completely annihilated the piece.

Overall I was very disappointed.

Marc Bridle interviews Freddy Kempf
Freddy Kempf plays Rachmaninov (BIS)

During the buy one ice-cream get one ice-cream free deal, Johann D'Souza watched a lady buy 100 cones and take another 100 cones for free. When questioned she said it was for her grandchildren. He asked her if he could be adopted.

Click to Return to the Concert Index!...
or Visit the Inkvault archives!

729: 5.7.2000. up.21.7.2000 ©Johann D'Souza

Readers' Comments


From: Goh Yew Lin (goh.yewlin@gkgoh.com.sg / Saturday, July 15, 2000 at 20:57:16)

I have to say, regrettably, that I agree with your review. The concert was a travesty of what fine pianism is about. Power without control; rushed conclusions with fistfuls of wrong chords not just in Prokofiev but in the Ballades; intensity exaggerated by senseless speeding; rushed melodies; hard and brittle tone. The potential of the music was barely explored. Kempf may have pianistic talent, but he displayed little musicality on this occasion. If I wasn't the organiser I would have booed.

From: Andrys Basten (andrys@netcom.com / Monday, September 11, 2000 at 02:17:20)

Hmm, from friends who went to Kempf's recital, there was a quite different impression of his determination to give an all-out performance despite jet lag from arriving the night before. Too bad that Derek, as you mentioned, could not present his different view, since this one was so damning. I would like to balance this, then, with an actual review from your local newspapers by a reviewer of musical acumen. I have his permission to excerpt it. From The Business Times, Singapore (Straits Times Interactive) " . . . One could spend days debating the merits, or the lack thereof, in Kempf's way with his tough programme for his eagerly-anticipated Singapore debut on Sunday, comprising four of Liszt's Transcendental Etudes, Prokofiev's Seventh Sonata and all four Ballades by Chopin. But whichever faction you support, it is hard to quarrel with the fact that here was highly-individual playing from a musician who identified strongly - sometimes overwhelmingly so - with the essence that ran through the veins of each piece, and the intense effect was likely to polarise an audience. Liszt thrives on blistering temperament: The dramatic items were rightly despatched with barnstorming vehemence, those terrifying rapid-fire chords in Wilde Jagd, in particular, rendered with torrential aggression, though the treble range was not quite so responsive. By contrast, Ricordanza was an aromatic blend of a beautiful singing melody against a pricelessly exquisite decorative backdrop, while the indestructibly permanent edifice of sonority in Harmonies du soir was breathtaking. The Prokofiev sonata might have benefited from some degree of patience in the build-up of drama. Then again, would the iconoclastic Russian enfant terrible really have grumbled that a young, daring and accomplished race-driver was taking his lean, mean war-machine down an empty autobahn at a dangerous but thrilling speed, negotiating bends with a daredevil spirit of adventure, all to electrifying effect that had spectators at the edge of their seats? I doubt it. The greatest controversy, however, lay in Kempf's volatile approach to the post-interval repertoire, Chopin's enigmatic Ballades, the last of which surely representing romantic expression at its most liberated. Was it all irresponsible, uncontrolled gibberish, an imperious result of artistic cynicism? After all, the swashbuckling coda of the Fourth Ballade, in particular, was a veritable mess. He might have been over-zealous, but I know for a fact that Kempf loves this music too much to be disrespectful. The huge risks taken were allied to his natural feeling for the larger musical forms, his mastery in zapping even the most overlooked of phrases to spine-tingling life second to none. And because of this, the A-flat Ballade was such a rich success. . . . Incidentally, we were lucky to be the last audience to have heard Kempf's Chopin Ballades before he records them in Stockholm today; maybe there will be tighter control and sharper focus in the preserved performances, but one hopes the passion and tasteful individuality remains. Now how's that for entering a new Golden Age in the new millennium? LIONEL CHOI " - Submitted by Andrys, who greatly respects Kempf's musical intelligence and believes in fairness

From: William Beh (kapellmeister@bigfoot.com / Monday, October 2, 2000 at 16:47:07)

I was also present at the performance. First, I have to say that no musician starts out by deliberately wanting to give a bad performance. That said, sometimes the difference between artistic intent and result is a huge one. I did quite enjoy Mr Kempff's performance, although I can also see the points that Johann made in his review. I'm not sure what to make of Mr Choi's review, though - suffice to say that "acumen" aside, he has great facility with colourful metaphors and a flair for grandiloquence. I might add that his impartiality here might be suspect, if only because he was himself involved with the Piano Festival in no small part.

From: mich fang (fangpiminator@hotmail.com / Friday, September 2, 2005 at 21:34:39)

respec da rapizt

From: yoafdcxf (tvjfbakb@mwpngfim.com / Thursday, October 4, 2007 at 05:56:26)

[URL=http://rvotgtwn.com]qmcnbygl[/URL] hagmfqmq ckohoezu http://rsqwaprr.com ypfjibsi mvorhxci

From: jhspwcuj (nwzscqrh@lnrvbrin.com / Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 00:54:15)

[URL=http://pmftrcta.com]bdcnzuor[/URL] tasietnn tfakwasq http://zgmgqfer.com djldwkpp hxcnavxy

 

Explore the Flying Inkpot

They're Alive!
Concert Reviews

Bit deadish:

Other Resources at The Flying Inkpot
Zine Scene Newslinks Movie Resources Booklinks
Chantelle L'amour Letters Page Inkvault Poetry
Home
PIANO FESTIVITIES

[an error occurred while processing this directive]