imagemap


Saturday
18 January 1997

Victoria Concert Hall
Singapore Symphony Orchestra
Maurice RAVEL (1875-1937) Le tombeau de Couperin (1919)
Review by Chia Han-Leon

Frederic Chopin (1810-1849) Piano Concerto No. 1 in E minor, Op.11 (1830)
Review by Isaak Koh

Sergei Rachmaninov (1873-1943) Symphonic Dances, Op. 45 (1940)
Review by Chia Han-Leon

Ian FOUNTAIN piano
SHUI Lan conductor

OVERALL NOISE RATING: 3 (beeping, coughing and some chatting)

The Noise Rating Index is a partially objective measurement of beeper blasts, 9pm and 10pm watch beeps, coughing-during-the-pianissimo-bits and other really inapt noises emitted in the concert hall during the music itself. It is measured on a scale of 0 to 5, in increasing annoyance.

This review has been kindly sponsored by Singapore Symphonia Company.


Isaak Koh and Chia Han-Leon

Chopin: Piano Concerto No. 1 in E minor, Op.11

Shui LanThe SSO has indeed achieved new levels of technical excellence with the coming of the new music director Shui Lan (left). Shui exudes an enthusiasm that infects every musician on stage, and this audibly translates into more committed playing, increased cohesiveness, and a general sense of fun all round. Attending a concert by Shui's predecessor was very much a solemn event. The new conductor smiles a lot more, and the players also appear to be enjoying themselves too.

This present situation has translated into favourable results in the musicianship. I have never heard the orchestra play with such verve and zest as in the Ravel piece. The synergy between the helmsman and the players was astounding, and ensemble was extremely tight. As evinced by the Inaugural Concert last week, the technical aspects of the playing were generally improved, particularly the lower strings.

The guest pianist, Ian Fountain, is the youngest-ever winner of the Artur Rubenstein International Piano Masters Competition at the age of 19. Being physically very tall, he towered over even Shui, who was on the podium! The concerto was well-conceived and nicely paced. There was a clear understanding between the conductor and the pianist as the movements flowed naturally into one another. Fountain's touch was firm and considered, and he played with poise and elegance. His playing during the demanding passages was impressive, although he seemed to lack complete confidence in the prestissimo parts, when the high notes became uneven. However, he was highly focused and this added cohesion to the Chopin (right) concerto. Overall, it was a lyrical rendition and was enjoyable.

The orchestra sounded congested and bloated in the opening passage and lacked transparency during the tutti portions. The sound images of the piano and the orchestra also seemed to come from separate places and did not blend together well.

Although the playing was not note-perfect and the acoustics less than ideal (what concert is ideal?), the spirit of the music was beautifully conjured, and it was this element that the audience clearly remembered. After receiving five rounds of applause (Fountain got four), Shui treated the approving crowd with an energetic performance of Brahms' Hungarian Dance No. 5. It was a treasurable evening and is surely a sign of better things to come.

Isaak Koh is an Honours graduate in English Literature from the National University of Singapore.

Ravel: Le tombeau de Couperin

Maurice RavelA magnificent concert -- not perfect, but very enjoyable indeed! Shui Lan seems as if he is going to make a name for himself with his encores of Brahms' Hungarian Dances. He even spoke to the audience, suggesting that we should end the concert on a happy note than with Rachmaninov's "dance of death." I really appreciated this, as I did when Kurt Nikkanen announced his encore before playing it (SSO 23rd Nov 1996). Too often are conductors thought of as dour stick-wavers whose only roles are guiding the bows and taking the bows; here we have a rare example of a musician who obviously understands that music is something we *play*.

And play they did: Ravel's homage to Couperin, one of the many shamefully-neglected composers of the French Baroque school. Ravel's Le tombeau de Couperin is an interesting suite of traditional dance forms that marries Impressionism with the age-old spirit of the danse.

Fine woodwind detail from the SSO, with clearly and cleanly balanced strings, just slightly short of a true chamber orchestra texture which I imagine will fit the suite better. We particularly enjoyed the exquisite ending of the first movement, with its unforgettable harp flourish to a scintillating string trill, which I thought was handled magically, without any hint of sentimentality. The Forlane that followed seemed playful to me despite its slowish tempo -- credit to the composer, conductor and orchestra.

The performance of the Menuet impressed me with its gorgeous handling of the dynamics and its almost harmonically-English string singing. More enjoyable performances from the winds in the final Rigaudon, although perhaps the playing can afford to be a bit more characterful. Are the woodwinds trying too hard to restrain their playing? I thought I detected some faltering in the Forlane. Finally, compliments to the strings again for their enjoyable, rather charming performances. There *was* a time when the SSO strings couldn't even pizzicato together. Their finely articulated accompaniment to the oboe-cor anglais theme in the Rigaudon indicates the passing of that time.

Rachmaninov: Symphonic Dances, Op. 45

Rachmaninov Magnificent tuttis abounded in the Rachmaninov (left), the SSO catching much of the "danciness" of this rather Shostakovichian work. Throughout the first dance, I felt a distinct weight and tension which I believe should have been imbued in the previous concert's Beethoven's Fifth. The drunken waltz effect of the second movement, with atmospheric contribution from the saxophone, demonstrated Shui's masterly control in portraying its underlying grimness, with a hint of night-club sleaziness.

The Symphonic Dances is Rachmaninov's swan song, with varied quotations of the Medieval "Dies Irae" (Day of Wrath) from the Requiem Mass. Whether you know the motif or not, the work is predominantly agitated and energetic, rhythmic and exclamatory. The SSO conveyed the restless excitement of the final movement with impressive intensity, and compliments to Shui for handling the false ending with startling drama. An exciting "end" to this concert -- one which we enjoyed much more than the last.

Still full of surprises, Shui's theatrical conducting of the encore, Brahms' Hungarian Dance No. 5, was (again) a very fun affair. I heard more than a few chuckles of approval in the audience, a sound with which I happily joined in. Here's proof then that a concert audience need not always be either quiet or coughing during the slow movement -- we can have reason to sound our pleasure at a good performance. And with a responsive orchestra under an entertaining conductor, why not?

Chia Han-Leon was chasing a degree when he wrote this and is currently pursuing an honours degree in English Literature at the NUS.

Click to Return to the Concert Index!...
or Visit the Inkvault archives!

087: 1997

Explore the Flying Inkpot

They're Alive!
Concert Reviews

Bit deadish:

Other Resources at The Flying Inkpot
Zine Scene Newslinks Movie Resources Booklinks
Chantelle L'amour Letters Page Inkvault Poetry
Home
MORE STUFF

  • Singapore Symphony Orchestra Homepage

    Do you have a website relating to classical music performance in Singapore? Tell us about it! Email classical@inkpot.com