| >modern dance for beginners by Escape Theatre Limited >reviewed by marcus tan >date:
15 jan 2003 >tired
already? go home then |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MODERN DANCE FOR BEGINNERS could be considered a double celebration in every way. The play, staged at the DBS Arts Centre, was both the Asian and International Premiere of this critically acclaimed piece written by contemporary British playwright Sarah Phelps, first performed in Soho, London. The performance was, furthermore, Escape Production's (a new theatre company dedicated to the exposure of British works to Asia) inaugural production. MODERN DANCE FOR BEGINNERS, directed by Samantha Scott-Blackhall, explores the prevailing modern attitudes to love, sex, and marriage. In this day and age where the old lament the ethical and moral decadence of society, and the young rally the call to liberalism and revel in the freedom of (sexual) expression, MODERN DANCE FOR BEGINNERS brings into focus on the stage the deeper and more stimulating issues of sexual intimacy and desire, love and human connection. Although the play may seemingly be just about sex, its powerful script also questions these dislocations without providing instant solutions. Staged as six distinct scenes partitioned by different seasons of the same year yet interconnected by the presence and association of familiar characters from previous sequences, the play essentially traces the love (and sex) lives of Owen and Frances, played by Mark Waite and Debra Teng respectively. Eligible as a Hollywood script, Frances - former lover and best friend of Owen - is bridesmaid to Owen's bride-to-be, Julia. The play opens with Frances coming into Owen's room just after the ceremony as she confronts Owen about his reasons for marriage. The latter is seemingly unable to provide a truthful and convincing reply, thereby reflecting his uncertain intentions for settling down - a common modern social trend. Conversation breeds intimacy and intimacy leads to a sexual interlude between the two. The subsequent scenes remove the audience from this private space to different moments in Owen and Frances' lives - specifically their sexual encounters with others - as the play explores the meaning of meaningless sex. |
||
|
>>'MODERN DANCE FOR BEGINNERS brings into focus on the stage the deeper and more stimulating issues of sexual intimacy and desire, love and human connection' |
While Waite successfully delivered the transitions between characters and was most convincing in the multiple roles he inhabited, Teng somewhat paled in comparison. Though she portrayed Frances - a modern woman neither confined by society's sexist labels nor repressed by Freudian stereotypes - with utmost confidence (she was most believable as a woman who upholds her independence by an aggressive celebration of her body and sexuality), her depiction of Julia as a repressed and depressed upper-middle class housewife seeking physical intimacy and acceptance was rather weak and enervated. The strong presence of Frances could still be traced in the portrayal of Julia despite a superficial costume change. In addition, Teng at certain junctures lapsed into local intonations, forgivably so since it is arduous to adopt a foreign accent convincingly for an extended period on the stage. Perhaps what was most impressive and most memorable were the ways in which the transitions between scenes were so effectively incorporated into the dramatic action, thereby creating continuity in the otherwise loosely-related narratives. The actors did not once leave the stage; costumes were cleverly hidden amongst the set (apparently sponsored by Barang Barang). While the music provided an interlude for Mark and Debra to switch roles and costumes, it also became a dramatic device that served as a bridge between the different scenes. The music assumed central significance as it became a line of action that "stood in" for the narrative absence of the characters. Written and devised by Darren Ng, the music cleverly fused diegetic and non-diegetic sounds, thereby allowing it to create a narrative of its own. |
|
The title becomes, in many ways, a metaphor for the play's concerns. Modern dance, following the artistic movements of modernism and post-modernism, is often fragmented, disjointed, instinctual, refractive and, often, solitary. Unlike more traditional Western dance forms which require a real connection between the dance partners, many modern dance forms seek to evoke an existential angst reflective of existence in modernity. The play reminds us then of the "anti-connections" so prevalent in society today - where sex and love have become disjointed fragments. As a sobering afterthought, the play calls to mind our need to perhaps learn to dance in synchrony again. The final scene brings us back to the hotel room that we left in scene one, with half an hour gone by. Frances and Owen admit to their own desires that surpass a sexual attraction bordering possibly on true love, but they part in the reality of Owen's marriage and Frances' own fear of commitment. Perhaps this is the real celebration of the play: it gestures, with hope, at the possibility of the existence of real connections yet leaves an audience to wonder if they are ever really possible in a world grown weary and wary of true love. |
||
|
Go
below to write in your comments or to read other comments about this performance!
|
Readers' CommentsFrom: The Editor (matthewlyon@myway.com / Monday, January 27, 2003 at 21:49:14) Got anything to say about the review or the production? Click the button above and let us know. From: Paul (lavalamp@pacific.net.sg / Thursday, February 13, 2003 at 16:24:06) As I didn't get a chance to see this production, I'm curious to know what the reviewers thought about the direction. Could either of them add their thoughts? From: Kenneth (bluekei@yahoo.com / Friday, February 14, 2003 at 14:25:31) I thought the acting was the weakest part of the production although it did get much stronger as the play went on; it started off really off-key but then worked its way up to okay and then good after that. I think for Debra who I've always been very impressed by, it was perhaps the whole British thing that knocked her off her mark, I don't know, the accent and all that; and for Mark it was taking on too many different types of roles and therefore not always playing to his strengths. The script was great - really intelligent, witty and funny even if it didn't particularly offer any new insights. Production values were very high - good choice and use of sound, lighting and stage with some really creative touches. Someone asked about direction, I think it was very strong. The pace and energy felt right and the blocking worked, not easy for a production that played around with the space the way this play did and more so, when you factor in the segmented nature of the script. All in all, a thoroughly enjoyable affair (I was practically rolling off my chair with laughter in some places) and a hopeful sign for even better productions to come from Escape as it becomes even more and more seasoned. From: Matthew Lyon (matthewlyon@myway.com / Saturday, February 22, 2003 at 15:19:24) I liked Scott-Blackhall's direction here and I linked it in 'Lonely Planet" too. It's reliable, well-paced and fluid with an intelligent use of space - which she shows off to good effect by (it seems) working closely with the lighting designer. From: lxgpdicx (eeabulje@jzgnmpfa.com / Thursday, October 4, 2007 at 14:49:20) tjawnaar xoxjsghq http://tlvdqvje.com oxxiaprk cobxujoy [URL=http://supwqenm.com]irdrtvhn[/URL] From: amgvhvbm (bymhwipp@tymaadvw.com / Thursday, October 4, 2007 at 14:51:26) ebwanomi zxywjyvy http://fxxilzpf.com bywaauum wedgpmfy [URL=http://xlmdqkxf.com]vbqpdgnw[/URL] |