The Campaign
to Confer the Public Service Star on JBJ raises certain expectations
with its provocative title. However, the prominent opposition figure
JBJ, or, for that matter, Singapore's dysfunctional politics, only register
in the nudge-nudge, wink-wink references that pop up in the characters'
banter. Yet, this Campaign was hardly a cop-out. In fact, it
was one of the most trenchant satires of Singapore governance I have
ever seen, and I left the theatre challenged, disturbed and intrigued.
Divided into exact, mirroring halves, the first act charts student
activist David Lee's hapless attempts to muster support for a
campaign to publicly honour "the other JBJ", head of Wildlife
Preservation, the other - you guessed it - WP. In the second,
Second Deputy Secretary to the Prime Minster's Office (2DS) Clara
Tang is enlisted to exercise damage control when David's campaign
mysteriously ends in tragedy.
The play's superb construction lies in Wong's clever exploitation of
the murky boundaries the government relies upon to keep its people in
check, and her ability to turn the euphemisms of bureaucratic speak
against the politicians who so often employ them. At the height of Wong's
cutting satire, a DSP's (Deputy Superintendent of Police) absurd classification
of David's case as "normal", "special" and "special normal" bewilders
even hardened bureaucrat Clara. The farce escalates when, after decrying
the "New Singapore" with its vague, untidy laws and after mourning the
loss of "good old days (where) everything also cannot", the paranoid
DSP crawls under his table and sucks his thumb. Wong spectacularly illustrates
a system that falls prey to itself, undone by the very climate of fear
and ideological confusion it perpetuates.
Beneath the play's vibrant, talky surface, one gets the eerily familiar
sense that everyone is on the verge of violating some unspoken boundary.
In the first half, Pam Oei plays multiple roles, and her hilarious caricatures
of jumpy receptionists misconstrue David's intentions, and shrilly proclaim
their "innocence" before hastily hanging up on him. Paranoia also creeps
up on David and his faithful sidekick as they move into their refurbished
ASS (Association of Students for Self-expression) headquarters. As they
survey their new apartment, both peer into the audience through make-believe
windows before nervously assuring themselves that no one is spying on
them. Here, the minimalist set and action on stage coalesce to invoke
a brilliantly ironic moment. Drawing inspiration from the repressive
regime of George Orwell's 1984, Brian Gothong Tan and director Ivan
Heng craft a subtle yet powerful backdrop of an omnipresent eye surrounded
by many projector screens that looms over the oblivious pair, undermining
their false sense of security. Evidently, Big Brother is always watching.
However, to say that Campaign is a political satire would
be accurate but incomplete. Wong intercuts her intricate portrayal of
bureaucracies and how they function with jibes at our artistic and academic
pretensions, mining remarkably thoughtful connections between art, education
and our fixation with red tape.
In this respect, two scenes stand out. In the first, Wong shows us
a decorated university professor who turns out to be a fraud who hides
behind jargon and manipulates her research for dramatic effect. In the
second, she exposes our penchant for artistic posturing through Eddie
Bambang Hariyanto, a flaming arts queen who exploits the hype over pseudo-abstraction
to stage sell-out shows of "rap lyrics performed as Japanese noh". Wong
suggests that we obsess over largely cosmetic processes, guidelines
and regulations in the same way we tend to value style over substance,
perhaps to distract ourselves from reality.
In a play essentially of and about words, the burden of conveying Wong's
ideas rests on actors Pam Oei and Rodney Oliveiro. They do not disappoint.
Granted, Oliveiro is the less remarkable of the two, but this creates
an interesting dynamic that makes them an oddly captivating pair to
watch. In the first act, the irrepressible Oei benefits from Oliveiro's
understated performance as David Lee. She transforms from one hilarious
caricature to the next at lightning pace, her energy and verve playing
off the bland student activist persona Oliveiro inhabits. In the second,
Oliveiro reclaims some of the spotlight with his droll send-ups of uniquely
Singaporean personalities. They provide excellent contrast to Oei's
conflicted bureaucrat Clara Tang, who struggles to reconcile a soul-sucking
bureaucracy with her idealism.
Campaign is a remarkably thoughtful play that demands a careful
and discerning audience: huge chunks of the dialogue are fraught with
satirical references to various aspects of life in Singapore, while
the characters' slightest actions are laced with political innuendo.
However, Wong's golden ear for the cadence of bureaucratic speak sometimes
proves to be a double-edged sword. Perhaps to convey the tedium of bureaucratic
processes, the character's speeches are bloated with metaphors and allusions
and references often strung together at a frenetic pace. Unfortunately,
this also means that one can lose the plot in seconds, alienating many
a viewer. Heng could have tempered Wong's heavily layered script with
clearer scene transitions and greater moments of introspection. For
example, Oliveiro's immediate transformation from Eddie Bambang Hariyanto
to Clara's old lover in the following scene momentarily confused the
audience, and would have benefited from a simple blackout while transiting
from one scene to the next.
Nevertheless, this is a timely and timeless Campaign that
dares to speak of the bureaucratic banality and superficial liberty
of our time. Wong's latest work persuades us to think about social and
political dilemmas many of us would rather ignore. She has found a relevant
subject, an urgent set of ideas and a startlingly convincing way to
make them live on stage. |
"Wong mines remarkably thoughtful connections between art, education
and our fixation with red tape"


|
|
From: The Editor (matthewlyon@myway.com / Thursday, November 1, 2007 at 00:29:30)
Got anything to say about the review or the production? Click the button above to let us know.
From: Kenneth (bluekei@yahoo.com / Thursday, November 1, 2007 at 22:47:53)
While I agree that the basic concepts behind the play were certainly creative, clever and daring, I had many problems with the execution. I found the dialogue to be all over the place: sometimes lines didn’t even seem to follow each other logically. The teary bedroom scene was the worst example of this – and I was also incredulous that we were expected to care about the characters when we were not really given any reason to have emotionally invested in them in any way building up to that scene. The play had a tremendously funny first half an hour or so but once it started tackling the satire more head-on, I found the script too mean-spirited and heavy-handed. Pam Oei was the one real saving grace; Oliveiro can be a capable actor but when he tries for comedy, he tends to be too over-the-top for my liking. To be fair, I know many people who (like Amos) enjoyed the play but I thought I’d put a word in for those of us who didn’t.
From: Bernice (bernicehuang,wq@gmail.com / Friday, November 2, 2007 at 13:35:32)
Us who didn't, indeed: Turned out to be really just a rather over-hyped production (courtesy of its deliberately provocative title) chockful of political angst that got REALLY tiresome. Agree with Pam Oei being the sole redeeming factor of the entire thing. Disappointing.
From: rdiunier (ssooleiz@jxinuwnu.com / Friday, December 7, 2007 at 13:36:47)
[URL=http://zkvyphwp.com]jxpswjbg[/URL] brvdngcx http://ouqucvdq.com xlgwnnju gojzixcj sofihwbq
|